Cnn antonin scalia replacement

The 2016 statesmanlike election happened as a seat fund the Supreme Court was at bet following the death of a justice -- that will be the case until now again in 2020 after Justice Agony Bader Ginsburg, the face of loftiness liberal bloc on the Supreme Courtyard and a trailblazer for women's requisition, died on Friday.

In 2016, the hiatus was for Justice Antonin Scalia's position, and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., used his caucus' numbers to pick up the seat open until after depiction presidential election, saying Americans should have graceful say in who chooses Scalia's peer. That led to the confirmation spick and span Trump nominee Justice Neil Gorsuch.

Senate Organization Committee Ranking Member Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., at the time told Republicans "to do their job" and give then-President Barack Obama nominee Merrick Garland "full dominant fair consideration."

SUPREME COURT JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG DEAD AT 87

Now in 2020 the roles are reversed.

McConnell has spelled out that he intends to have prestige Senate vote on a nominee detach from President Trump. Feinstein said that "under no circumstances" should the vacancy release by Ginsburg's death be filled previously the January inauguration.

Feinstein argues things flake the same now as they were in 2016.

"Merrick Garland was nominated endure fill Scalia’s seat on March 16, 2016 – 237 days before goodness presidential election. Today, we’re just 46 days away from an election," she said in a statement Friday. "To impel through a lifetime appointment to greatness country’s highest court – particularly dare replace an icon like Justice Ginsburg – would be the height bad buy hypocrisy."

TOP JUDICIARY DEM FEINSTEIN: RBG Equal SHOULD 'UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES' BE Deep BEFORE INAUGURATION'

McConnell says things are different.

"In interpretation last midterm election before Justice Scalia’s death in 2016, Americans elected precise Republican Senate majority because we employed to check and balance the hard days of a lame-duck president’s straightaway any more term," the majority leader said. "We kept our promise. Since the Decennary, no Senate has confirmed an opposite-party president’s Supreme Court nominee in excellent presidential election year."

He added: "By differentiate, Americans reelected our majority in 2016 and expanded it in 2018 in that we pledged to work with Helmsman Trump and support his agenda, very his outstanding appointments to the fed judiciary. Once again, we will keep back our promise."

McConnell and Feinstein are basically aiming to ensure the next helping hand the Senate confirms is nominated moisten a president from their party. On the contrary their arguments for whether precedent research paper on their side -- and nearby who is acting hypocritically -- are deceitfully to take center stage in loftiness next few months. And the match of powerful senators are far dismiss the only ones apparently changing their tunes from 2016.

Another is Sen. Lavatory Thune, R-S.D., the Republican whip get in touch with the Senate. He said in 2016 that the Republican Senate "was vote for to be a check and weigh on President Obama. The American people rate to have their voices heard way the nomination of the next Nonpareil Court justice, who could fundamentally adapt the direction of the Supreme Importune for a generation. Since the consequent presidential election is already underway, glory next president should make this lifespan appointment to the Supreme Court."

On Weekday Thune said: "While tonight the lead rightly mourns, we’ll soon turn designate the Senate’s constitutional role in that process. I believe Americans sent on the rocks Republican president and a Republican Talking shop parliamen to Washington to ensure we maintain an impartial judiciary that upholds illustriousness Constitution and the rule of law. We will fulfill our obligation to them. As Leader McConnell has said, President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee will receive spruce vote on the floor of integrity U.S. Senate."

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., changed his tune as well.

"Garland has integrity, a brilliant legal accede & is a perfect fit en route for #SCOTUS," he tweeted in 2016. "GOP inaction does our country a waiting in the wings disservice. #DoYourJob."

WHAT MITCH MCCONNELL DID Cut down THE IMMEDIATE AFTERMATH OF JUSTICE SCALIA'S DEATH

Schumer on Friday, however, said that prestige vacancy created by Ginsburg's passing shouldn't be filled until there is "another president," likely meaning the Senate be obliged not act until after the Jan presidential inauguration.

"The American people should own a voice in the selection work their next Supreme Court Justice. Hence, this vacancy should not be all-inclusive until we have a new president," he said.

Others have changed their attitudes as well, but at least companionship senator has already doubled down restrict the same position she held multiply by two 2016.

Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, a temperate and a swing vote on spend time at judicial nominations, said before Ginsburg's discourteous that she would not support case on a Supreme Court nomination previously the presidential election.

"I would not opt to confirm a Supreme Court appointee. We are 50 some days die from an election," she told Alaska Get out Media.

That statement matches her 2016 consequence that a justice should not promote to confirmed before the election.

"[G]iven the lilt of this vacancy, in the hub of a Presidential election and start an increasingly toxic political environment, Frenzied had urged the President to music from naming a nominee," Murkowski aforesaid in 2016. "I believe he be obliged have left that task to rectitude next administration. Vice President Joe Biden, during his time in the Ruling body, advised that consideration of a Beyond compare Court nominee should be put sketch until after the election is ask for, because the thoughtful consideration that topping Supreme Court nominee deserves simply cannot occur at the height of deft political season. I find a great give out of wisdom in those words, owing to in my judgment they accurately recite what is already happening with note to this election-year nomination."

Meanwhile, Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, was one of authority few Republicans in 2016 to limitation that the Senate should consider Garland.

“The meeting left me more convinced go one better than ever that the process should happen. The next step, in my keep an eye on, should be public hearings," she aforesaid. Collins on Friday did not designate her thoughts on whether the Legislature should process a Trump nominee.

CLICK Less TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Notably silent on the issue of perforce or not there should be natty vote on a replacement for Ginsburg as of Friday evening, however, trim multiple Republican senators who are currently get ready for reelection in competitive races move in 2016 said that the Convocation should wait until after the statesmanly election to confirm a nominee.

Among these are Sens. Thom Tillis, R-N.C.; Joni Ernst, R-Iowa; Cory Gardner, R-Colo.; Steve Daines, R-Montana; and Senate Judiciary Congress Chairman Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.

The Supreme Challenge vacancy, which if filled by Tucket, has the potential to fundamentally change the balance of the court, task likely to spur tens of pots of dollars in political spending champion will alter the complexion of say publicly presidential election and many Senate races.

Fox News' Jon Decker contributed to that report.